He claims he did not obtain the CDIB information from registration records, but instead figured it out due to his vast knowledge of Cherokee families. To an inexperienced Cherokee researcher, that might sound logical. To anyone who understands the complexity of Cherokee genealogy, the uncertainty of many variables and the fact one must have a starting point, the claim is ludicrous.
In order to try to guess a blood quantum recorded on a CDIB,
- one would have to know the Dawes ancestor/s a person descends through. If you don't know the Cherokee family a person descends from, it is impossible to correctly state, beyond a doubt, the number recorded on a person's CDIB, no matter how much knowledge you have on Cherokee families. Period.
- if one knows the Dawes ancestor/s a person descends through, they would also have to know the number of generations between the living person and the Dawes ancestor. Without knowing that, it is impossible to correctly state, beyond a doubt, the blood quantum listed on the living person's CDIB.
The contractor correctly and confidently stated the number recorded on the candidate's CDIB. The contractor appeared to have no doubt in what he was sharing. How was he so sure when the candidate had never shared the names of his ancestors?
There is one other variable that is specific to this situation that should be considered.
The candidate's blood quantum amount listed on his CDIB is not correct, based on the siblings of his Dawes ancestor. The full siblings (same parents) living at that time are all listed as 1/2 Indian blood, while the candidate's ancestor is listed as 1/8. If one would have guessed at a BQ based on knowledge of old Cherokee families, they would have likely guessed a higher blood quantum, not the lower and exact amount listed on the CDIB.
Once again, the contractor seemed to have no doubt in his purported calculation of the candidate's blood quantum. Why was he certain he knew what that CDIB card said? There is only one way he could have known for certain.
Does any of this matter? Maybe not. It's likely the contract signed has specific provisions that state the contractor would not disclose to any third party any confidential information, no matter where the information was obtained, as well as defining what information is considered confidential. If that is the case, the court of public opinion doesn't matter therefore explaining the flaws in the contractor's argument are unnecessary. Violating the conditions of a contract should have consequences and violating a person's right to privacy should have consequences. The big question is, will the Cherokee Nation Attorney General's office do anything about it?
Those are my thoughts for today.
Thanks for reading.
copyright 2015, Polly's Granddaughter - TCBTweet